- updated: October 29, 2005

Jim Drummond - Political Perspectives

Yorba Linda Star - October 27, 2005 - Viewpoints Section

Complete Text - Requires Registration

Excerpts:

Yorba Linda voters invariably make wise decisions when they consider local ballot measures affecting the community’s quality of life. Now they’ll get another chance to shape the city’s future when they cast ballots on the “Right to Vote” initiative next June.

Of course, initiatives and referendums usually are pretty straightforward, since their texts remain the same before and after an election. But post-election votes cast by City Council members sometimes stray from their pre-election promises, very often on land-use issues.

That’s one reason the city’s low-density advocates support the initiative. They want to codify the right of citizens to vote on major housing and commercial density questions.

Voters made two smart choices early in this city’s 38-year history. The vote for cityhood in 1967 and the adoption of a strict low-density General Plan in 1972 helped establish the community’s most valuable asset — a semi-rural environment with plenty of open space.

An advisory vote in 1986 led to banning “safe and sane” fireworks, and another in 1992 showed residents overwhelmingly favored limiting City Council members to two terms.

But some council members ignored the latter vote, so residents cast ballots on two measures in 1996, one a two-term limit and the other a three-term limit. Both won by large margins, but the three-term limit garnered more “yes” votes, so it became law.

The most recent controversy was over a citizen-initiated referendum to reverse a council-approved Imperial Highway improvement project in 1998. The measure was defeated by a 3 to 2 margin in an election fueled by big-dollar donations from the city’s developers.

The upcoming Right-to-Vote initiative election also will draw intense developer interest. Council members opposed to the initiative have proven their ability to attract significant contributions from developers and other individuals and businesses with ties to developers.

The money allows them to hire professional political consultants, post hundreds of roadway signs and, importantly, pay for numerous costly, colorful campaign mailers.

Council members are understandably touchy when developer donations to their campaign treasuries are discussed. But the real issue should be their acceptance of outside-the-city special interest money, not someone’s reports about the transactions in the newspaper.

Judging by the late-night rancor on both sides of the dais at the last council meeting, the Right-to-Vote initiative might become the city’s most controversial ballot measure yet.

A FINAL NOTE — The effort by downtown developers to “reincarnate the soul of Yorba Linda’s history” by restoring Old Town buildings and architectural styles got off to a less than auspicious start, when they revealed plans for their own Main Street headquarters.

Developer Michael Dieden and his partners recently submitted refurbishment plans for the former Frazzare Jewelers building at 4889 Main St., which they purchased in May.

But Bruce Cook, the city’s principal planner, noted, “… the proposed upgrades … do not meet the standard of quality as determined desirable by the city.” Cook recommended eight modifications before Dieden’s designs for the building’s façade are approved.

“This project will set the bar and be the precedent for future projects. As a consequence, staff believes the bar should be set high,” Cook wrote the city’s planning commissioners.

Complete Text - Requires Registration